|
Background to GBI
SUCCESS STORY: AFFECTING MACRO-ECONOMIC POLICY AND PROCESSES
THE GENDER BUDGET INITIATIVE
-
TANZANIA
By Tanzania Gender Networking Programme, Activism, Lobbying and Advocacy (ALA)
Programme
A
Tanzanian NGO dedicated to achieving gender equality and women’s empowerment
illustrates the potential of influencing government to achieve policy changes
with a gender perspective.
Background:
The Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (TGNP) is a non-governmental
organization working to obtain social transformation with a gender focus in all
levels of society. The NGO has been pioneering a Gender Budget Initiative (GBI)
since mid-1997 in close collaboration with other NGOs who compose the Feminist
Activism Coalition (FemAct). The GBI was developed in the context of cost
sharing and retrenchment policies implemented as part of structural adjustment
programs in the 1980s. These programs precipitated vital social services,
particularly health care and education, being dramatically cut at the same time
as liberalization and privatization caused massive layoffs of government
workers. It was also coming at a time when the majority of civil society was
feeling marginalized from policymaking and budgetary processes in the country.
Issue:
Created out of this context, the aim of GBI is to advocate for a more
people-centred participatory development strategy with equitable and just
allocation of resources. The strategy is to influence and transform planning
and budgetary processes to utilize participatory techniques and to take into
account the practical and strategic needs of marginalized communities,
particularly women, poor men, and youth. The concept is not to develop a
separate budget for various groups but rather to integrate issues of
equitable/just distribution of resources into all steps and stages of the
budgetary process.
Objectives:
1. To
work towards influencing budgeting processes and allocations in relation to
objectives of gender equality, equity and social justice;
2. To
promote the design and adoption of gender-sensitive pro-poor instruments for
analysis, usage and monitoring of gender mainstreaming in the national budget;
3. To
organise and carry out a lobbying campaign to influence policy/ decision-makers
and technocrats so as to meet activist objectives noted above;
4. To
strengthen lobbying and advocacy skills of civil society to organise an
effective campaign to promote poor women and men’s participation in public
resource allocation; and
5. To
provide popular information in order to educate and solicit support for the
campaign.
Action:
To fulfill these aims, TGNP has been developing strategic points of entry within
the government, Parliament, and civil society. This process has included the
following activities:
1. Preparatory
Activities/Planning
·
Instituting the program within TGNP and FemAct structures
·
Identifying and building working relations with key government actors
·
Building a documentation base/ building links with other related initiatives,
such as South Africa, Australia, and Commonwealth.
2.
Action-oriented research activities in the selected sectors
·
Research was conducted at the national level (Ministries) and district level
(related sectors at the district level). Research was done in the Planning
Commission and Treasury, as the key sectors in the planning and budgeting
process; Health and Education, as vital service providers; Agriculture as
essential to the livelihood of most Tanzanians; and Industry and Commerce, given
the significance of market/ trade liberalisation policies in the globalisation
process.
·
Data was collected and analysed with a gender focus on the process of planning
and budgeting; composition of the budget officers, technocrats, and
decision-makers; sources of income; allocation of the resources both to sectors
and within and planned and actual output.
·
Within each sector, data was collected by a team of three researchers, one from
the university (economist or sociologist), one from NGOs and one from the
government sector involved. Government actors were integrated into the process
as researchers, providing access to data that would otherwise be considered
confidential. This also enabled building ties between TGNP and technocrats
working in the respective ministries. The university researcher added the strong
quantitative research and academic background and the NGO researcher contributed
issues of gender, participatory techniques and analysis of social impact.
3. Feed-backing
and dissemination of research findings
·
Reports were disseminated to different sectors of society beginning with
activist organisations, government departments and external agencies.
·
Findings were shared through working sessions and public forums with civil
society, donors, policy makers and technocrats within the researched areas, and
various groups of MPs, specifically the Parliamentary Budget Committee.
4. Development
of lobbying strategies and tools for Parliamentary and public lobbying
·
One such strategy was the publication and dissemination of a popular book called
Budgeting with a Gender Focus, which outlined the gender gaps in the
budget in an easy-to-read and understandable format.
·
Entry was also made into Parliament through lobbying, and making contacts with
individual women and men MPs and key Parliamentary Committees, such as Finance
and Economics.
5.
Capacity building on gender as related to budgets
·
Capacity building was done of NGOs and CBOs at the national and local levels to
support lobbying efforts on issues of gender and budgeting.
·
Capacity building efforts were also made for allies and key actors in government
Ministries, specifically in areas of gender as related to participatory planning
and budgeting.
·
This project has now become more systematic, as the government has committed to
gender mainstreaming the budget, as will be further described below.
6. Development
of tools/ instruments for gender budgeting
·
The organisation developed alternative budget guidelines, as an example of ways
in which these guidelines could be gender mainstreamed.
·
A checklist was also developed to guide budgetary planners and technocrats to
mainstream gender into all parts of the process.
·
Recently, a tool was developed to guide the collection of gender-disaggregated
data.
7. Information-sharing
and coalition building and networking
·
Information has been popularised, through flyers on GBI in Kiswahili, usage of
the media and website, and public forums.
·
Members have also attended strategic fora to share information at the national,
regional, and international levels.
·
Coalition building and networking at all levels has been used to create
alliances, contacts and solidarity with other groups and people, promoting
collective action.
8. Lobbying
and government and donors’ structures and processes
·
The organisation has sought to influence processes like the Public Expenditure
Review (PER), Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and Tanzania Assistance
Strategy (TAS).
9.
Documentation of GBI processes
Results:
Due to these efforts and others stressing the importance of mainstreaming gender
in budgetary processes and decision-making, the organisation has gained a great
deal of access into government structures and strategic decision-making bodies.
The organisation has been invited by government and donors to be a part of the
Public Expenditure Review (PER) process and the Tanzania Assistance Strategy
(TAS) processes. As a participant in these processes, TGNP in cooperation with
the FemAct Coalition has been able to push a collective agenda and advocate for
transformation in macro-economic processes, transparency and accountability by
government actors and inclusion of more pro-poor gender perspectives in
government decision-making.
As a result of lobbying, one paragraph on gender was included in
the 1999-2000 budget guidelines. In the 2000-01, two paragraphs were included,
which mandated that all Ministry, department and agency (MDA) budget submissions
be prepared with a gender focus. In order to achieve this goal, TGNP was
commissioned by the Ministry of Finance in partnership with SIDA to facilitate a
project to gender mainstream six sectors of the budget. The six earmarked
sectors were: Health; Education; Agriculture; Water; Ministry for Community
Development, Women Affairs and Children; and Regional Administration and Local
Government. Activities within the pilot sectors included:
·
Conducting training workshops for budget officers in the sectors;
·
Providing backstopping services through organised working sessions
with the budget officers during their preparations for the 2000-01 budgets, and
·
Developing tools, including a checklist, for assisting
mainstreaming processes.
The above activity, which was recently evaluated by an external consultant for
the government showed that government actors within the selected sectors and the
Ministry of Finance acknowledged that they had benefited from the workshops and
backstopping services. The Ministry of Water (MoW), which was the Ministry,
which made the most active use of TGNP’s backstopping services, also had the
most wide-ranging insertions of a gender perspective into its proposed budget,
demonstrating the impact of capacity building efforts, spearheaded by government
and facilitated by TGNP. On the whole, the evaluator commented that, “The
government’s ownership of GBI processes and its technical application was a
useful indication for its sustainability.” Since then, the Ministry of Water
and Livestock added a specific allocation for gender mainstreaming in the 2003
budget.
In the Ministry of Health, support for drugs to pregnant women so as to protect
children from transmission of HIV/AIDS infection at childbirth was added to the
2003 budget after lobbying together. However, there has been less success in
getting the government to increase resources in general to HIV/AIDS issues.
In the long-term, the Treasury plans to gender mainstream the budgets of all
government sectors. The national budgetary guidelines developed by the Ministry
of Planning for the development of the year 2001 budget specifically gave these
sectors the mandate to mainstream gender into their budgets. This exercise
increased the awareness and capacities of a variety of budgetary actors
concerning the importance of taking gender into account when planning, and it is
the hope of TGNP that it will be the first in a series of such activities.
Future Plans:
In order to lay solid ground for the coming campaign, Phase 1 of the GBI process
(1997-2000) focused primarily on information collection, research and
dissemination, and capacity building. The second phase of this process,
starting in the year 2000 has combined ongoing budget engagement with a national
campaign, ‘return resources to the people’. This campaign is aimed at
three levels:
1.
General Public / civil society
– raising public awareness on the importance of playing an active role in
resource allocation processes. The translation of the popular book on the budget
into the national language, Kiswahili, has assisted in promoting economic and
budget “literacy.” The goal of this campaign is to create a public demand for a
voice in the national budgetary processes, with an emphasis on participation,
transparency, accountability, and transformation
2.
Government
–Parliamentary lobbying efforts and advocacy activities in selected government
Ministries will continue to an even greater degree.
3.
Donors
– Efforts would be made to influence the macro-economic frameworks, structures
and systems, through engagement with the Public Expenditure Review (PER),
Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS), Local Government Reform and other processes.
Lessons/ Challenges:
Building capacity at various levels is essential.
One of the main obstacles faced by the organization has been the low capacity of
many actors in civil society to analyse and critique macro- and micro-economic
issues. This handicap arises from their systematic exclusion from participation
in decision-making processes on policy and resource matters. A continuing
barrier is having a sufficient pool of informed actors to meet training needs as
well as future plans to raise public awareness. Vital to the process is
increasing the skills of government actors to link gender issues in relation to
budgeting and macroeconomics.
Meeting expectations can be difficult.
While TGNP is eager to serve as a role model for similar processes in other
countries and places a strong emphasis on coalition building and networking, the
needs of various actors can sometimes spread the capacity of the organization
thin. A continued emphasis on bringing more actors into these processes is
anticipated to assist in addressing this challenge.
Work with government while protecting the civil society agenda.
By viewing government officials as partners in the research and capacity
building processes, the government and civil society were able to learn from
each other and capitalize on each other’s strengths. It has also given the NGOs
involved insight into the constraints of government, while alleviating some of
the bureaucratic red tape that can often hinder a project. At the same time, a
continuing barrier remains apathy and frustration on the part of budgetary
planners caused by hierarchical processes that gave them little control over the
actual budget allocations or process. This is enhanced by extremely high donor
dependency at the resource level, with associated donor power in
decision-making. At the same time, an additional challenge remains ways to lobby
government – and donors – to genuinely transform decision-making processes at
all levels.
Challenging international macro-economic frameworks is essential.
These frameworks, including structural adjustment and PRSP, have marginalized
the government and meant that there are fewer resources to support development.
Therefore, one role of NGOs is to advocate for transformation of these
processes.
More information on GBI issues is available in the
following TGNP publications:
Budgeting with a Gender Perspective
Activist Voices
Against Neo-Liberalism
Gender Budget Analysis in Tanzania 1997-2000. |